Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: William Wilson
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8869
    Date: 3/22/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08869
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Cc:
    Subject:
    William Wilson
    Monday, March 22, 2010 2:06 PM
    secretary
    exp 15 @hotmail.com
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN 3038-AC61
    From: William Wilson in Las Vegas, NV
    I support the comments about the proposed Forex rules submitted to you by the IB-Coalition.org organization.
    I agree with the contents of their 10 page letter to you and urge you to carefully read and follow its suggestions.
    In particular I suggest the following changes to the proposed rulings:
    ¯ First, I urged the CFTC to revise the proposed rules to permit a Forex IB to operate either as an independent IB subject to
    the same minimum capital requirements that apply to a futures IB or as a guaranteed IB.
    ¯ Second, I asked the CFTC to undertake a study of the retail Forex markets to assure that the rules it ultimately adopts are
    based on a solid factual understanding of the markets and are tailored accordingly.
    ¯ Third, I propose the CFTC defer to NFA to set appropriate leverage restrictions as it relates to the proposed 10:1 leverage.
    An onerous leverage restriction, such as this, creates opportunities for unregistered fraudulent schemes to exploit U.S.
    customers is contrary to the public interest.
    Sincerely,
    William Wilson
    This mail was sent via IB Coalition http://ibcoalition.org/take-action/