Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: C J Jackoson
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 2848
    Date: 1/22/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-02848
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    C.J Jackson
    Friday, January 22, 2010 4:21 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Mr. Stawick,
    I happen to be a big fan of sensible regulation. I've heard of 400:1 leverage being given to some forex
    traders in the past, and I think that is ridiculous. I even think 200:1 leverage is ridiculous. But your
    proposal for 10:1 leverage is equally as ridiculous on the other end of the spectrum. Now some traders
    will choose 10:1 leverage as a personal choice but for all of us without millions to invest, the only way
    to make slight profits in the foreign exchange market is to have up to 100:1 leverage. This is not an
    extreme level on the either end of the spectrum. And if the leverage isn't extremely high or extremely
    low (like 10:1) then it must be perfect. I understand the politics in Washington right now for harsh,
    sweeping regulations across the board. I'm not the type of person that will try to tell you how to do your
    iob, I just try to give practical advice. Don't just hammer the forex traders for no real reason. This
    appears to just be political and sometimes pure political regulations can have negative outcomes. This
    100:1 leverage in the forex market is not a threat to the economy. And mandating 100:1 leverage as the
    max in the forex markets is the sensible thing to do.
    ID # R1N 3038-AC61
    I hope you do the right thing.