Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Andrew Abt
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1907
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01907
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Andrew Abt
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:54 PM
    secretary < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Good Afternoon,
    In regards to RIN :~0:~8-AC61, I respectfully request that this does not pass. It is my belief
    that if this passes two things will happen. First, many retail forex traders will not be able to trade
    anymore. Many retrailtraders use the 100:1 leverage currently so that they can spend time
    learning the markets while only using a small percentage of their capital. Taking this option away
    by requiring 10:1 leverage will only cause traders to leave the forex market or use more of their
    money in the market which they could potentionally lose versus a small amount they can afford to
    lose now. In short, you are either driving business away from the forex market or you will be
    causing some traders to lose more capital than they should. My second belief is that requiring
    10:1 leverage will cause many US traders to seek accounts in foreign countries where they can still
    use 100:1 leverage. This is bad forthe retail brokers that many traders use. In affect, you would
    be reducing business for US companies while helping foreign companies build their businesses. I
    don't believe that's what America was built on and I hope you don't vote yes to this 10:1 leverage
    proposal.
    Sincerely,
    Andrew Abt
    Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
    Sign up now.