Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Felipe Mora
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8915
    Date: 3/22/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08915
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Felipe Mora
    Monday, March 22, 2010 9:55 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear sirs,
    I am writing to oppose to your proposal to change Forex leverage to
    i0:i.
    First of all, I believe any person should have the freedom to select the best alternative suited to their own needs
    and possibilities.
    Forex is indeed a high risk investment, for which anybody who wants to use it has to learn and practice to
    become a suitable and knowledgeable trader before investing any money. That is why brokers offer demo
    platforms and learning courses. A person who decides to enter the market without the necessary preparation
    will do it with a high or low leverage. (Maybe he does not even know what leverage is). A lower leverage will
    not necessarily deter the ignorant trader from making bad decisions.
    For the small investor, the 100:1 (or more) leverage is the only possibility of being part of this magnificent
    trading instrument. Besides, since many other countries offer low leverages, regulating to 10:1 would make the
    American brokers totally uncompetitive and all of the small investors, Americans and from many different
    nationalities, would
    "fly"
    to other countries, taking all their money, which I believe is not insignificant.
    American brokers are reliable and very well regulated, which makes them attractive to many traders across the
    world.
    I am including the identification number RIN 3038-AC61.
    Thank you for taking in consideration my opinion.
    I hope I can continue using American brokers in the future.
    Regards,
    Felipe Mora
    Bogota,
    Colombia