Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Paul Vermillion
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8561
    Date: 3/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08561
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Attach:
    [email protected] on behalf of
    Paul Vermillion
    Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:43 PM
    secretary
    Re: Public Comments on Regulation of Retail Forex
    Regulation of Retail Forex - Paul Vermillion - 10 077 -.pdf
    Hi Mr. Secretary: Regulation of Retail Forex comments attached. Sincerely yours, +PAULPaul Vermillion
    6335 Double Eagle Dr
    Stoney Creek, NC 27377
    March 18,2010
    The Honorable David Stawick
    Secretary of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    1155 21st Street Northwest
    Washington, DC 20581
    Re: REGULATION OF RETAIL FOREX
    Dear Mr. Secretary,
    In this decisive hour of our nation's history we are writin8 to express our deep concern
    over a sinsle, specific provision, in the proposed Resulation of Off-Exchanse Retail
    Foreisn Exchanse Transactions and Intermediaries.
    We ask you to please OPPOSE the imposition oj
    ~
    a 10-to-1 leverage ratio on Forex.
    We ask that you please SUPPORT the maintenance of a 100-to-1 leveraqe ratio on Forex.
    First, the proposal to put a 10-to-1 leverage ration on Forex is like putting a speed
    limit
    of 10 km/hr or 6 mph on the Autobahn.
    What that means is that one would not be able
    to make much money in Retail Forex. That is not good for the US or its businesses.
    The Retail Foreisn Exchanse is like an Autobahn interstate hishway:
    ¯ In this illustration, at a
    500-to-1
    leverase (like speedin8 down the Autobahn at
    500 km/hr or 310 mph), one could drive at the crazy speed of 310 miles per hour
    on this major hish-speed road, that we will call the
    ForexAutobahn.
    ¯
    At a
    400-to-1
    leverase (400 km/hr or 250 mph), one could drive at 250 miles per
    hour on the Forex Autobahn.
    ¯
    Those are not safe speeds of travel for most financial motorists on the Retail
    Forex financial hishway.
    Setting a
    100-to-1
    leverage ratio would be like posting a speed limit of 100 km/hr or
    62 mph on the Forex Autobahn. That is an appropriate speed limit for this major
    financial highway.
    However, to propose dropping the leverage ratio to
    10-to-1
    is like to propose dropping
    the interstate speed limit down to 10 km/hr or 6 mph.
    A speed limit of 6 miles per hour
    (a 10-to-1 leverage ratio) is not an appropriate speed limit for the interstate highway of
    foreign exchange we call the Forex Autobahn. It is not a sufficient speed/leverage to
    make the road usable or safe. It is not a sufficient speed/leverage to allow the road toPaulVermillion
    March 18,2010
    Page 2
    be used for serious commerce to generate income for US Citizens and US Businesses
    and revenue for the US Government.
    Second, taking into account the national median household income of US Citizens
    (544k), a leverage ratio of 10-to-1 would require the outlay of an extraordinary
    5200,000 per citizen who planned to trade the foreign exchange with safe position
    sizes--risking no more than 2% of one's portfolio on any given trade.
    Asking the average
    citizen to put up 5200,000 (at a 10-to-1 leverage ratio) to be able to trade the Forex
    market reasonably safely is too much to ask.
    However, askin.q one to put forward
    $20,000 Cat a i00-to-i leveraqe ratio) to trade the Forex prudently, is reasonable.
    Third, at a 100-to-1 leverage ratio, the median US Citizen has the potential, with
    proper training, to make a living for one's family,
    successfully trading the foreign
    exchange.
    At a 10-to-1 leverage ratio, the opportunity to realize the American Dream
    through trading Retail Forex is made impossible.
    As we told the world's leaders at the U.N.:
    "We
    must choose between a world of fear
    and a world of progress. We cannot stand by and do nothing while dangers gather. We
    must stand up for our security, and for the permanent rights and hopes of mankind. By
    heritage and by choice, the United States of America will make that stand."
    Mr. Secretary, we make that stand with you. In so doing, while we cannot speak for all
    of our constituents, we
    are supremely confident that we are voicing the convictions
    and concerns of the great preponderance of those we are privileged to
    serve.
    Please know that we are available to assist in any way you might deem helpful as you
    stress our nation's commitment to responsible free enterprise and free markets.
    Sincerely Yours,
    Paul Vermillion