Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Marc Vieux
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8483
    Date: 3/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08483
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Marc Vieux
    Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:26 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Email:
    .s. #[email protected]. ~.c.: g .o)1
    "
    Fax: ~(.2. ~0..2. )..4..1~ .8..- o5..5. ~ .1
    Mail: David Stawick,
    Secretary, ~ .o..~..m...o..d.!~ ..F...u.t. ~ i.e. A..T..r.a..d.i..n.g ...c. £..m.. ~.i.s. §)2 .n.,
    1155 21st Street, NW,
    Washington, DC 20581
    David Stawick,
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
    1155 21 st Street, NW,
    Washington, DC 20581
    Subject: Regulation of Retail Forex
    Identification number RIN 3038-AC61
    This is my request NOT to remove the 100:1 Leverage Option
    Should the 10 to 1 leverage rule proposed be adopted I believe the following will happen
    ¯ Funded accounts currently in the U.S. will go offshore.
    ¯ Forex fraud may worsen, not improve. Unregulated dealers from around the world will thrive,
    while operating under without the same rules of capital adequacy, risk management
    models, marketing ethics, dealing practices or returning of customers funds.
    ¯ The United States will loose millions of dollars in trade revenue.
    ¯ Thousands ofj obs that require an advanced education such as softwarei0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08483
    developers, accountants and foreign exchange dealers will be lost, or
    moved out of the United States.
    Please do not take away my choice to use the 100:1 leverage OPTION!
    Very Concerned,
    Marc Vieux
    Brooklyn NY