Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Andre C
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8398
    Date: 3/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08398
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    AC Group
    Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:45 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex # RIN 3038-AC61
    David Stawick,
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
    1155 21st Street, NW,
    Washington, DC 20581
    Subject: Regulation of Retail Forex
    Identification number RIN 3038-AC61
    This is my request NOT to remove the 100:1 Levera.qe Option
    Should the 10 to 1 leverage rule proposed be adopted I believe the following will happen
    Funded accounts currently in the U.S. will go offshore.
    Forex fraud may worsen, not improve. Unregulated dealers from around the world will thrive, while operating under without the same
    rules of capital adequacy, risk management models, marketing ethics, dealing practices or returning of customers
    funds.
    The United States will loose millions of dollars in trade revenue.
    Thousands of jobs that require an advanced education such as software
    developers, accountants and foreign exchange dealers will be lost, or
    moved out of the United States .
    Please do not take away
    my choice
    to use the 100:1 leverage OPTION!
    Very Concerned,
    Andre C. FI,