Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Charles A Mitchell
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8265
    Date: 3/17/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08265
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Charles A Mitchell
    Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:22 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    I am a consistently profitable trader in FX--that is, in part, a result of leverage. If your rule to reduce all
    traders leverage to 10:1 is inacted, it will kill retail Forex in the US, and drive that business to overseas
    competitors (along with the jobs related to brokers). I can say without hesitation that I would take my
    business overseas to maintain my performance. As you are aware, many (if not all) competent money
    managers will do same. I appreciate your good intentions; however, nothing good will come of this rule.
    By enacting this rule, you are merely shifting regulatory responsibility overseas, which I suspect is exactly the
    opposite of what is intended. As it stands, I have taken issue with the rule that makes hedging difficult
    and/or expensive in the US. This ill thought-out rule alone has caused me to consider moving funds to a
    UK broker. Believe me when I tell you the monetary migration has already begun. Stop damaging what is a
    good business. I know you intend to make Forex safer for investors. By my estimation, you are merely
    killing the business for participants in the US. Do us all a favor, and slow down or better yet, stop. I have
    yet to see a rule that actually helps traders.
    Charles Mitchell
    Louisiana