Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Brett Coleman
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8116
    Date: 3/17/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08116
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    brett
    Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:22 AM
    secretary
    'Regulation of Retail Forex'
    Dear Secretary:
    I am commenting on the proposed regulations concerning the Retail Forex trading market, R1N 3038-AC61. Specifically,
    the requirement in proposed section 5.9 Security deposits for retail forex transactions. In this section, you propose a
    security requirement in 5.9 (a) of:
    percent of the notional value of the retail forex transaction;
    This requirement is significantly higher than the current requirement that most retail forex brokers have established with
    their retail forex customers. The industry standard is currently one percent and your proposal is ten times greater. We
    agree that all trading funds that retail forex customers use should be discretionary funds, that is, their loss would not affect
    the customers standard of living. With this being the case, how much reward or loss that the retail forex customer can incur
    should be left to the discretion of the customer and governed by the NFA's current leverage restrictions of 100 to 1. It is
    my belief that the NFA current leverage restriction is entirely adequate and appropriate for retail forex brokers and
    customers.
    By increasing the margin requirement to ten percent, a retail forex customer would have ten times more money exposed in
    one trade. Should the trade move against the customer, most retail forex brokers would close the trade at the initial
    investment, i.e., the current margin requirement of one percent. Under your proposal, the retail forex broker would close the
    trade at the initial investment also, but in this case, it would be at the ten percent requirement. This would entail the
    customer having a ten times larger loss than would currently occur with most retail forex brokers. This does not mitigate
    the customers risk, it increases it significantly. If the intent is to mitigate the customers risk, then leave the retail forex
    customer security deposit at one percent and require the retail forex broker to close the trade if it loses its initial investment.
    Your proposal to regulate the financial, fiduciary, and other aspects of retail forex brokers business should be beneficial in
    reducing non-performing retail forex brokers, such that the NFA current leverage restriction of 100-1 should be adhered to,
    meaning the security deposit should be written to read:
    percent of the notional value of the retail forex transaction.
    Sincerely,
    Brett Coleman