Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: fyfnjkm vfrcbvtyrj
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 8037
    Date: 3/16/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08037
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    fyfnjkm vfrcbvtyrj
    Tuesday, March 16, 2010 7:50 PM
    secretary
    'Regulation of Retail Forex'
    Moe MHeHIIe
    iHET,JItO~H CKJIOHHBI CAMH BBIBHPATB C KAKHM FUIEqOM HM
    PABOTATB,ECJIEI qEJIOBEK HE PA3BEIPAETC~t B TOHKOCT~tX PBIHKA OH BCE PABHO CTAHET
    BAHKPOTOM FIPEI JItOBOM FUIEqE!Cnacn6o!
    Hello! My name is Anatoly. To you thanks that you have reduced the credit lever to 1:100, the credit shoulder more than 100
    is not meaningful. Your thought concerning reduction of a shoulder till 1:10 it is already severe, if your law comes into force
    many pros begin to earn less (my personal opinion this compulsory reduction of a shoulder till 1:20 though really each trader
    himself chooses with what shoulder to it to work if he has chosen a shoulder 1 : 100 it realises to what risk its capital)
    My opinion is subject as the pro-answer is not present, PEOPLE are inclined to CHOOSE With WHAT SHOULDER IT to
    WORK IF the PERSON DOES NOT UNDERSTAND SUBTLETIES of the MARKET IT ALL THE SAME BECOMES the
    BANKRUPT AT ANY SHOULDER! Thanks!
    RIN 3038-AC61.