Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 89 FR 48968

  • From: Tyler Pratt
    Organization(s):
    Academic

    Comment No: 74056
    Date: 8/5/2024

    Comment Text:

    As an economist specializing in the energy sector, I strongly oppose the proposed ban on event prediction contracts related to congressional control. These contracts could be vital tools for forecasting legislative impacts on energy policies and market dynamics.

    Energy companies could use these contracts to hedge against potential regulatory changes that significantly affect production costs and market competitiveness. For example, predictions on congressional outcomes would inform strategic planning to mitigate risks associated with varying regulatory environments.

    The characterization of these contracts as speculative "gaming" overlooks their substantive contribution to risk management within highly regulated industries. Unlike traditional gambling activities, these contracts have the ability to facilitate informed decision-making and support long-term investment strategies aligned with market expectations. The Commission needs to reconsider the proposed ban and support regulatory frameworks that promote market transparency and innovation. By approving these contracts, the CFTC can foster a regulatory environment that enhances economic resilience and investor confidence in the energy sector.

Edit
No records to display.