Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281
Note:
If you experience an issue clicking on the "View Comments", the "Submit Comments", or any other buttons, please clear the cache in your browser and refresh the page. In Chrome or Edge, you may refresh the cache by holding down the ctrl key and clicking the F5 button.
-
-
From:
Robert F
Organization(s):
Comment No:
739
Date:
1/19/2010
Comment Text:
i0-001
COMMENT
CL-00739
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Technocrat
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:13 PM
secretary
100:1 is just fine, leave it alone
It's unclear what 10:1 would do any differently that isn't happening already. Perhaps an addendum
should be attached to attempts at regulation such as this to make clear what the real intent is. It's an
industry that's finding it's feet and doing quite well at it. The unsavory types are being thrown out and
the new entrants are given an attempt to find responsible trading habits without large capital
requirements, an opportunity everyone should have available.
Go after the banks or something or better yet, start investigating entities that appear to regulate without
representation. Just stop already, 100:1 is just fine.
Robert F.
