Comment Text:
Dear CFTC,
I am currently a high school teacher in Minnesota but I previously worked for local government as an advisor. I focus on connecting classroom lessons and entire curriculums with real-world issues. Kalshi’s election prediction markets could provide an engaging way to teach students about the impact of political decisions on various sectors, such as healthcare, education, and the environment. By using these markets, students could predict election outcomes, track policy changes, and discuss the implications for their communities. This interactive approach would make civics and economics more relevant and engaging, helping students develop critical thinking and data literacy skills.
The CFTC’s move to ban these markets limits our ability to offer practical, hands-on learning experiences. By integrating prediction markets into our curriculum, we could foster a deeper understanding of political risk, economic trends, and the importance of active participation in the political landscape. The tool that Kalshi could be providing is essential for preparing students to navigate the complexities of democracy and participate actively in their communities, meanwhile the CFTC is restricting this ability for millions of students around the country.
Thank you for your time,
Angie
