Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Kristen J Bickham
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 7326
    Date: 3/13/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-07326
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Kristen Lambert
    Saturday, March 13, 2010 1:07 PM
    secretary
    Status?
    Hello there,
    Can you tell me the status of the proposed regulations of retail forex?
    Kristen J. Bickham
    214.405.5345
    --- On Thu, 1/21/10, secretary

    wrote:
    From: secretary
    Subject: RE: Regulation of retail forex
    To: "Kristen Lambert"
    Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 4:47 PM
    Your submission has been received by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Please
    be advised that this acknowledgement does not constitute either Commission approval of the
    subject proposal or a determination that the proposal is consistent with the Act and the
    regulations thereunder.
    From: Kristen Lambert [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent:
    Thursday, January 21,2010 1:58 PM
    To:
    secretary
    Subject: Regulation of retail forex
    Hello,
    I'm writing to you to express my dissatisfaction and strong opposition to the proposal to reduce
    the leverage allowed in the retail forex market from 100:1 down to 10:1.
    This is an unjust proposal, and should NOT be passed as a legitimate regulation.
    Furthermore, if enacted, it not only hurts the retail trader, but it also hurts the retail firms that
    have worked so hard to build up their client bases. Retail investors will most certainly move
    their accounts off shore in order to still get the advantage that 100:1 leverage allows.i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-07326
    Typically, regulations protect those firms that are regulated and harm the consumer. Examples
    of this can be seen in unjust price regulation of insurance rates, the lack of inspections in meat
    factories that continually put out contaminated meat, title insurance that must be bought by the
    purchaser when homes are sold giving the title insurer a 97% gross margin, etc.
    Government involvement in markets is not the solution. Government generally is the problem
    and regulatory regimes are typically unjust and inefficient at best. At worst, they are
    manipulated by those that they purport to regulate as the regulators are merely biding their time
    until they can triple or quadruple their salaries by taking jobs in the firms they used to regulate.
    The SEC is a classic example of the revolving door.
    Please do not allow unjust regulation to enter this market. This proposal must not be passed.
    Sincerely,
    Kristen J. Bickham
    214.405.5345