Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Paul Walsh
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 7070
    Date: 3/12/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-07070
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Cc:
    Subject:
    Paul Walsh
    Friday, March 12, 2010 10:36 PM
    secretary
    [email protected]
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    TO: Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
    Dear David Stawick,
    As a trader I want to suggest that you do NOT change leverage to 10:1
    If that proposal is passed then the USA will lose:
    - over 90% of retail forex accounts in the USA will go over to the UK and the rest of Europe.
    - Thousands of high educated jobs will be lost in the USA.
    - An industry worth over $1.005 TRILLION will no longer operate in the USA, and the USA loosing
    hundreds of million in taxable revenue.
    -
    The proposal does not fix fraud. Battle against the unlicensed FDMs and IBs fix the fraud, not
    traders leverage.
    - 100 to 1 leverage is very popular. Traders simply will not accept 10 to 1 leverage, and I
    guarantee you they will just close their accounts in the USA and open new accounts in the UK.
    Conclusion: Thousands of jobs lost when unemployment is at 10%, consumers more vulnerable to
    fraud, and the United States tosses is flushing over 1 Billion a year in taxable revenue (as a
    miniumum).
    So leave my leverage alone and vote NO to the proposed 10:1 leverage rule change.
    Paul