Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Jason Eber
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 7066
    Date: 3/12/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-07066
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Cc:
    Subject:
    j ay98711
    Friday, March 12, 2010 10:32 PM
    secretary
    [email protected]
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN 3038-AC61
    Hi,
    I would like to voice my objection to the maximum leverage rule change to 10:1 for retail forex trading.
    That is a significant and rediculous change. That would drastically affect my trading strategy so much
    that I would be forced to move all of my current trading accounts to either offshore brokerage houses
    outside the US or to deal with unregulated brokers within the US. All of these rule changes in the forex
    industry do not protect the investor. In fact the actually harm the investor. The leverage offered in forex
    is the main reason why I choose to invest in forex. I became a trader seeking high risk high return types
    of investments, and forex satisfied those desires. The only thing that these rules protect are the
    uninformed ignorant forex investors that do no understand the fundamental rule of finance. Greater
    the risk = higher rate of return. In the end these rules will just force customers to go outside the United
    States which leaves the regulated US brokers an unfair advantage in attracting customers. Global
    trading environments function best when there are a common regulations between all parties involved.
    The forex market is not strictly a US market, therefore the US government will never be able to
    completely control it.
    Thank you,
    Jason Eber
    iay98711 @earthlink.net