Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Industry Filing 22-002

  • From: Michael Marcus
    Organization(s):
    NA (Individual)

    Comment No: 69728
    Date: 9/22/2022

    Comment Text:

    My name is Michael Marcus, and I am a growth equity investor at Sageview Capital. I am
    writing this public comment to support Kalshi’s efforts to gain CFTC approval for their political
    control contracts. Please note that my view does not reflect my firm's view in any form and this is my individual view.

    Congressional control impacts me in many ways. For instance, the myriad fights over the debt
    ceiling and the corresponding “fiscal cliff” that characterized the split Congress of 2011-13
    underscores the dangers that political control can have to anyone in the financial space. The
    uncertainty as to whether the US would meet its debt repayment obligations heightened worries
    in the financial sector. The stock market fell (it would take another year to get back to where it
    was pre-debt ceiling crisis), volatility spiked, and interest rates rose as risk premia across the
    economy soared. As one U.S. Department of the Treasury report found, “In the late summer of
    2011, the 30-year conventional fixed-rate mortgage spread jumped by as much as 70 basis points and the wider spreads lasted into 2012. For an average mortgage of $235,000 at that time, 70 basis points more on a mortgage rate would increase monthly payments by about $100 per
    month.” (SOURCE BELOW)

    Today, electoral hedging is a privilege afforded to those with access to over-the-counter
    derivatives desks. In other words, only the rich have access. But like millions of other
    Americans, I am a citizen who pays taxes, holds a mortgage, and has retirement savings linked to the value of the stock market. As a result, my financial health is inextricably linked to political
    control, and this market would enable me to hedge those risks. Just like regular citizens hedge
    their hurricane risk with hurricane insurance, their fire risk with fire insurance, and their flood
    risk with flood insurance, so should we be able to hedge our political risk with political control
    event contracts.

    To me–like millions of my fellow civic-minded citizens–elections are not a game. These markets
    not a tool to gamble on or to play with. They are a means for me to improve my financial
    security by reducing my risk exposure to events outside of my control. I hope the CFTC
    recognizes that fact, and permits these contracts to proceed.

    SOURCE:https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/276/POTENTIAL-MACROECONOMIC-IMPACT-OF-DEBT-CEILING-BRINKMANSHIP.pdf

Edit
No records to display.