Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Kris Ganjam
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 6960
    Date: 3/12/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-06960
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Kris Ganjam
    Friday, March 12, 2010 8:04 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN 3038-AC61
    I would like to express my strong opposition to the proposal that would reduce retail forex leverage from the current maximum
    of 100:1. Having traded futures and forex for over 10 years, I know both the power and dangers inherent in trading with high
    leverage. A novice forex investor can easily fall prey to high volatility in the marketplace. Yet, it is this leverage that
    incentivizes knowledgeable and experienced traders to provide both liquidity and valuable information to the market. As
    absolute movements of exchange rates are relatively small in response to news and information, leverage is absolutely
    necessary to allow traders to profit from the considerable efforts put forth in scrutinizing trade balances, political developments
    and the vast flow of economic data. Without such traders contributing liquidity and information, markets quickly become
    inefficient. In such a critical market as forex, the global economy is at stake and inefficiencies in the market can have very dire
    consequences. I strongly urge you to keep the current leverage regulations in place to maintain a healthy global marketplace
    and enable traders to profit from the efforts necessary to maintain market efficiency. At the same time, I would suggest
    increased training and education for new entrants into the forex market. One viable option used by some brokers is to require
    new account applicants to first pass a rigorous online exam which critically tests their fundamental understanding of the
    consequences of trading in highly leveraged markets.
    Thankyou,
    Kris Ganjam