Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Stephen Leahy
    Organization(s):
    Black Bay FX Services LLC

    Comment No: 67
    Date: 1/15/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00067
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Stephen Leahy
    Friday, January 15, 2010 10:42 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Sir/Madam:
    As a small business owner who has been a CFTC-regulated entity in one capacity or another since 2002, I
    strongly urge you to consider not invoking the 10:1 leverage proposal included in the CRA proposal.
    My reasoning will probably be different from others'. And there are two key points for me to make.
    1) I run a small company that generates a few million dollars per year in revenues (not all from retail
    Forex). We directly employ 7 people here in Boston, and there are a few service providers for whom we
    do not provide a full-time job, but who rely on my company as a key source of their income. I have been
    able to realize one of my goals in that my employees have been able to increase their standard of living
    by joining my company and performing their jobs well. That is a part of the covenant that I feel l have with
    them. They rely on me to give them an opportunity. I rely on them to fulfill the day-to-day roles that keep
    the company running. And the opportunity that I have found and built a company around is the increasing
    demand for an asset class that is a tradable market, rather than an asset class that is dependent on
    positive economic data such as stocks, bonds and mutual funds. A reduction in leverage as is proposed
    would essentially close down retail Forex in the USA. I will close my company and I will move on to do
    something else. My employees will lose their source of income and stability and join the ranks of
    unemployed.
    I am a small player in this industry. I can conservatively estimate that there are 5,000 jobs directly related
    to retail Forex here in the USA. Additionally, there are numerous individuals who rely on income earned
    by providing services to the retail Forex client base. The proposed change in leverage will add to the
    nation's unemployment lines and not do much of anything to benefit US residents who wish to trade
    Forex (see my next point)
    2) The CFTC and has the authority to regulate the US firms that choose to be regulated and become
    members of the National Futures Association. But the CFTC can not regulate where a retail Forex trader
    can open an account and execute trades. So far we have seen approx 70% of our client base migrate to
    clearing firms not in the USA. Outside the US, clients can still use leverage that is greater than what you
    propose, and have some of the trading functionality that you have already eliminated here in the US. So
    what benefit are you providing retail Forex traders? The retail Forex trader now has to open an account
    with an offshore broker (exposing the client to risk). The retail Forex trader is still using whatever
    leverage they so choose. And the retail Forex client is trading away from any NFA-regulated firms so that
    the CFTC and NFA now have no control over the clients trading.
    What you have done with the recent regulation changes, and what a reduction in leverage would do is
    actually hurt retail Forex clients. If your goal is to benefit those US residents that choose to trade Forex,
    you should be taking steps to increase their demand to trade under an NFA-regulated entity. The
    challenge is that the NFA would then have to police the unregulated scammers and con artists that prey
    on potential retail Forex traders. And that act of policing unregistered firms is something the NFA and
    CFTC has done poorly in the last 8 years. But it can be done.
    The regulated firms such as my firm and the firms that we deal with all act in accordance with CFTC and
    NFA rules. So take steps to keep US retail Forex clients here in the US. And then spend the effort to
    curb and stop the unregistered influences on the clients. THAT is the way that you can benefit retail
    Forex clients.
    Stephen Leahy
    Te1:617.357.6100
    Fax:617.357.5100i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00067
    Web: http ://wwvv. ba ckbayfx.co m
    E-Mail:
    slea hy~.backbayfx.com
    Skype: Backbayfx
    Back Bay FX Services, LLC
    425 Boylston Street, 2nd Floor
    Boston, MA 02116
    This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an
    authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. If you are not the addressee thereof or the person responsible
    for its delivery and if you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and
    then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Any dissemination or
    copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in
    this message are not given or endorsed by Back Bay FX Services, LLC, unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative. BBFX's
    e-mail system is for business purposes only. All e-mail may be reviewed by authorized personnel, and may be provided to regulatory
    authorities or others with a legal right to access such information.
    Trading in the Foreign Exchange market is a challenging opportunity where above average returns are available for educated and
    experienced investors who are willing to take above average risk. However, before deciding to participate in Foreign Exchange (FX) trading,
    you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. Do not invest money you cannot afford to lose.
    Back Bay FX Services, LLC is a registered NFA member (0388617)