Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Jason Dowd
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 6633
    Date: 3/8/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-06633
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Jason Dowd
    Monday, March 8, 2010 11:33 PM
    secretary < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulationn of Retail Forex
    I am writing you to let you know I strongly oppose the proposed leverage caps and margin requirements for retail
    forex.
    While I can understand why someone not experienced with foreign exchange trading might think 100:1 leverage
    sounds crazy, it should be considered that very large movements in foreign exchange are quite rare, and
    speaking as a reasonably experienced forex trader I would like to assure that it is not as scary as it sounds.
    In addition, positions in foreign exchange are usually quite modest compared to positions in other investment
    vehicles like real estate.
    I can, however, understand restricting leverage to be no more than 100:1. Even I think that leverage in the area of
    400:1 is extreme. But that's four times the current standard!
    Finally, it is worth noting that the industry objection is quite valid: if this leverage cap is put in place, I will be driven
    to trade with foreign companies that do not impose such restrictions. I have no interest in doing this, but if it is
    made necessary, I will. So if your intention is to protect me and my interests, which I hope it is and I do
    appreciate, then this will have the opposite effect as I will no longer have the benefit of your oversight to insure
    that my broker is honest.
    Thank you for considering my opinion.
    Respectfully,
    Jason Dowd
    Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
    Sign up now.