Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Adam G Thornsley
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 6501
    Date: 3/7/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-06501
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Adam G. Thornsley
    Sunday, March 7, 2010 7:41 PM
    secreta ry < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Greetings,
    The proposed regulation to reduce the margin allowance for forex trading from 100:1 to 10:1 is
    absolutely ridiculous and unnecessary and Iam strongly opposed to it. All majorforex brokers in
    the United States already help manage risk to margin users by automatically closing positions
    before the client finds themselves in a negative equity position. By reducing the margin to this
    degree, you'll only be adding to the frequency for which that occurs for legitimate investment
    purposes that have sound macroeconomic reasoning behind them. Additionally, there are long-
    term investors currently using 100:1 margin that would have to close their positions prematurely
    as a result of this drastic margin change in order to keep their position from being called back.
    Investing, just like any other form of business, requires a level playing field in order for individuals
    in one country to do as well as those in another country. Changing the allowable margin levels to
    this degree will essentially squeeze out all forex investing in the U.S. and put U.S.-based investors
    ata severe disadvantage to the rest of the world. That's a huge transfer of wealth out of this
    country and into others. That's alsoa big blow to tax revenue. I hope you reconsider this poorly
    conceived regulation.
    Thanks,
    Adam Thornsley
    Austin, Tx
    [email protected]
    Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
    Get it now.