Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Curtis Gibbs
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 6305
    Date: 3/5/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-06305
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Curtis Gibbs
    Friday, March 5, 2010 6:48 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
    I am writing in regards to the proposed specific regulation for the limitation on leverage by Forex retail
    companies.
    I have recently opened an account with a Forex retail company, and having only a year of experience
    trading stocks. I was very optimistic of my chances for eventually making a living trading both stocks
    and Forex currencies. And with only a limited budget, I thought the Forex leverage amounts was one of
    the best opportunities for quickly adding to my income that I could have ever found. It is much less
    expensive than trading futures with a futures exchange. This being something that I would like to have
    the opportunity to do also. However, I could not possibly afford it at this time. It just requires to large of
    a deposit to get started. And with a futures exchange, even micro-currency futures are expensive to
    trade and use the wider dealing spread. Making it difficult to see how this is a better alternative to the
    less expensive currency trading with the Forex retailers that use the tighter dealing spread. And most of
    all, I was able to open an account with a $250 deposit.
    However, I personally hope that the Forex industry could be made as legitimate as possible with
    helpful regulation for Forex customers. And if there is a change made to the leverage amount allowed,
    it should be reasonable amount that does not interfere with traders having the best opportunity possible
    to trade foreign currencies.
    Sincerely,
    Curtis Gibbs