Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Chris Guli
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 6114
    Date: 3/5/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-06114
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Chris Guli
    Friday,
    March 5, 2010 10:21 AM
    secretary

    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Secretary,
    I was dismayed to see this proposed change to the regulation for US
    based currency/FOREX dealers and retail account holders such as myself.
    This will only serve to destroy the current retail FOREX market as we
    know it in the US. Unless a trader is comatose, they are fully aware of
    the risks of highly leveraged trading, such as 100:1 F OREX retail
    trading accounts. It is this risk/reward which brings enthusiasm and
    liquidity to the market.
    If a trader wants to limit risk exposure they already have many options,
    including mini and micro accounts which all brokers have now. So, to be
    clear, I am against a proposed LIMITATION of a 10:1 leverage. It should
    be an OPTION not a limitation. The retail trader signs an agreement
    which is clear in many places of the risk of leverage, so if a trader so
    chooses, he or she should have the OPTION of the level of risk they are
    comfortable with.
    If this limitation is enacted, it will destroy the US market and retail
    traders will seek activity overseas. Let's regulate but not OVER regulate.
    Thanks, Chris Guli