Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Rob Plank
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 594
    Date: 1/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00594
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    RobPlank
    Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:26 PM
    secretary
    Change of Margin Requirement, CFTC
    Basically, I am firmly against the proposed margin change. A better
    cure for the
    economy would require the banks to reduce their leverage back to the
    previous
    level of 10 to 1, not 20 to 1 that will take years. The lost decade is
    already here,
    I guess the rules changes means that this decade should be extended into
    several
    decades.
    The primary reason is that the U.S.Treasurey will LOSE tax dollars.
    It does NOT take a rocket scientist to figure out that an account can be
    opened
    overseas to eliminate the domestic (USA) currency margin requirement
    ¯ (or is that in the game plan - to outlaw all legal and taxed oversea's
    accounts?)
    The the results is that the successful traders will be paying foriegn taxes
    prior to domestic taxes on the profits. The foriegn taxes on the profits
    are deducted
    against any domestic taxes. As for the unsuccessful traders ... they will
    not be around long anyway - so the lost tax revenue is not a consideration.
    Rob Plank
    Gainesville, FL
    [email protected]