Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Daryl Mercer
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5653
    Date: 3/1/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05653
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Attach:
    [email protected]
    Monday, March 1, 2010 4:51 PM
    secretary
    17 CFR Parts 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 140, 145, 147, 160, and 166 Regulation of Off-Exchange Retail
    Foreign Exchange Transactions and Intermediaries
    N FAproposed Ru lema king 20100301. doc
    Please consider the attached comments. Thank you.
    Daryl MercerMarch 2, 2010
    P.O. Box 11202
    Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
    Secretary of the Commission
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21 st Street NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Sirs:
    I am a forex trader and am writing to provide my comments and express my concerns
    about the proposed leverage reductions being considered by your organization. I believe
    the proposed changes will profoundly affect my profession.
    I have dedicated myself to trading and have spent a considerable amount of time and
    money to become a proficient trader. I now trade full-time.
    I understand and appreciate the risks associated with the higher leverage typically offered
    by forex brokers. Obviously, leverage can work for you or against you, depending on
    your knowledge of the market, your application of proper money management principles,
    and the integrity of your brokerage firm.
    By lowering the leverage to the proposed 10% level, you are effectively requiring me to
    substantially increase the funds in my unprotected trading accounts to support the same
    level of trading and profitability. These substantially larger cash reserves are not
    protected by the SIPC or any similarly chartered organization and can be completely lost
    should the broker go out of business.
    I understand and appreciate that your organization has responsibilities to try to keep the
    playing field as level as possible and I appreciate the changes you have made to clean up
    the brokerage side of the business. I suggest that you also require brokerages to no
    longer treat an individual with a trading account as an unsecured creditor. They should
    be required to structure their brokerage in such a way that they cannot use deposited
    funds as their own piggy bank, similar to what stock brokerages are required to do. For
    the most part, the brokerages that I have dealt with seem to be doing a much better job.
    Thank you for that. If I enter into a bad trade, I have nobody to blame but myself for the
    outcome and I can accept that and use the information from that trade to learn and
    improve. However, I have virtually no power to correct the situation if my broker is
    treating me unfairly.Finally, please recognize that I am a professional traders and take my trading very
    seriously. I do not require, nor do I desire, the government to "protect" me by enacting
    the rule changes that you have proposed. It will not accomplish its intended goal. It
    seems counterintuitive that, if over the age of 21, I am allowed to completely destroy my
    financial life and that of my family in a casino where the odds of just breaking even are
    impossibly large, while at the same time, the government feels compelled to protect me
    as a professional trader from myself.
    Please reconsider your proposed rulemaking. Thank you for your consideration.
    Sincerely yours,
    DarylMercer