Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Mark Matzeldelaflor
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5460
    Date: 2/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05460
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Friday, February 19, 2010 2:45 PM
    secretary
    Public Comment Form
    Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
    ([email protected]) on Friday, February 19, 2010 at 14:45:06
    commenter_subject: RIN 3038-AC61
    commenter_frdate: January 20, 2010
    commenter_frpage: 3281-3330
    commenter_comments:
    CFTC et al:
    is Harmful
    Regarding RIN 3038-AC61. The fact that this
    proposed regulation is being considered raises many
    questions. It seems apparent to me that the motives
    of this regulation are to disable the Off-Exchange
    Retail Foreign Exchange Markets, prevent
    participation by United States Citizens, and
    attempt to move them to exchanges such as the CME.
    This proposed regulation has unscrupulous written
    all over it. The fact that the CFTC is pandering
    this as an attempt to protect the consumer is
    particularly offending. Perhaps it is the sentiment
    at the CFTC, that United States Citizens are
    incapable of making their own decisions, and
    require a "smarter" group of
    people to make decisions for them.
    Please explain how restricting leverage to 10: 1.
    will protect the consumer? The only purpose this
    serves is to require that retail clients deposit
    more of their hard earned money with an FCM to
    trade the exact same amount. This is putting the
    consumer at more risk since more of their money is
    on deposit with an FCM which has the possibility of
    defaulting, filing for bankruptcy, etc. which would
    of course freeze the customers funds, and have a
    severe negative impact on their financial well
    being. This will drive the consumers to search for
    unregulated alternatives, putting the consumer at
    more risk.
    It seems to me that the CFTC is purposefully
    attempting to drive the small American Investor,
    the working class family, to other markets, or none
    at all. This proposition makes a clear and
    offensive statement by the CFTC. That United States
    Citizens don't know what is good for them, and that
    they should not have the freedom to make their own
    decisions unchecked by a federal entity.i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05460
    To put it bluntly, this proposition is an attack on
    every working class, United States citizen
    attempting to increase the standard of living for
    their family.
    Do what's right. Leave the choice in the hands of
    The People, where it belongs. I am a customer, and
    I do not feel like the CFTC is attempting to
    protect my interest, rather the CFTC is attempting
    to redirect my investment monies to other assets
    for unscrupulous reasons.
    I am a United States Citizen, and I approved this
    message!
    commenter_name: Mark Matzeldelaflor
    commenter_withhold_address_on: ON
    commenter_addressl: 1237 23rd St
    commenter_city: San Diego
    commenter_state: CA
    commenter_zip: 92102
    commenter_phone: 8583444001