Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Ismail Akmuradov
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5255
    Date: 2/9/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05255
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Ismail Akmuradov
    Tuesday, February 9, 2010 1:17 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    DearCFTC[],[]
    [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] The proposal to reduce the leverage assumes that traders are not using leverage
    properly. Having leveraging capabilities isn't tantamount to over-leveraging one's positions, and this is
    what the []proposal is failing to recognize; instead, leverage merely allows a trader to exercise exact risk
    management in relation to the size of their positions. For instance, if a trader wished to risk only 1% of
    their total capital per position, they would use leverage to determine the amount that they are willing to
    risk per pip, based on the size of their stop loss. Having leveraging capabilities allows a trader to
    dynamically adjust the size of their stop, so as to accommodate the current volatility levels of the
    market, while still maintaining a fixed position risk, regardless of whether they are risking 10 pips or
    1000 pips.
    Conversely, not having such leverage available will likely negatively impact traders who are using
    appropriate risk management. Reducing the leverage means that you will have less available margin for
    active positions, even if you are risking the same amount in both scenarios. This means that such traders
    are more likely to experience a margin call, assuming a consistent position risk, if the leveraging
    allowances were to be reduced
    The most unpalatable part is that the proposal suggests not only to limit the leverage - they evidently
    intend to practically eliminate it Anyone who trades the forex markets knows that this would effectively
    put an end to US-based retail forex trading, since very few people would be able to properly trade under
    such a mandate. US-based FCMs would go out of business, and US-based traders would invest their
    money with oversees brokers.
    The [] proposal sadly appeals to the lowest common denominator: the people who over-leverage
    positions with inappropriate stop-losses. In doing so, they consequently hurt all of the traders who trade
    with appropriate risk management, and merely use leverage as a necessary and responsible tool.