Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Peter Dominguez
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5029
    Date: 2/4/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05029
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Peter Dominguez
    Thursday, February 4, 2010 9:12 PM
    secretary ; 'Ryan Gallavin'
    Request
    Dear David Stawick, Secretary:
    As a participant member of GFT FOREX I am here requesting that your wanting to change RIN 3038-AC61 be reconsidered.
    It appears that this change will force me out of trading because the leverage rule is substantially too low to participate in
    trading. If your change is to control the house abuses than a different change can be made to control that side of the house
    and not the participants. I do not know what you have in mind in said rule and it would be interesting and allow me to deduce
    what the intent of the issue is by the regulation. It would be helpful to know. I don't believe in punishing a single party to
    punish the world. The following line is what is in question:
    The 'Regulation of Retail Forex' is in the ID number RIN 3038-AC61 and in the body of the message. As a Forex trading
    customer, my feelings to the CFTC are, that this 10:1 leverage rule must not stand, or my ability to trade Forex on a leverage
    basis will end.
    Thankyou.