Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: B&S Cape Town
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 4913
    Date: 2/4/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-04913
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    B&S Cape Town
    Thursday, February 4, 2010 2:42 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN 3038-AC6
    To whom it may concern
    I am a South African citisen with a retail forex account in US. I am currently member
    of a Live Trading room and enjoy consistant results. This is partly due to myself managing
    risk via lot sizing and money management techniques. Although I am able to trade larger lot sizes
    I actively manage risk in all open positions as I see fit. The new proposal of 10:1 leverage restriction
    will violate my ability to manage my portfolio of trades effectively given the startegies that employ.This after a
    recent
    100:1 restriction was put in place -did they make a mistake?
    I feel strongly that the reduction of leverage will make US retail FX accounts very unattractive for
    new and exsisting retail FX participants. This will most definately result in job loss and capital flowing out of
    the US to more attractive brokers (and even unregulated ones!). There is allready brokers mentioning that they
    will drop all US clients if
    the new proposal comes into effect. If regulation needs to be increased why not rather focus on educating
    prospective
    FX participants? Does the average FX client needs to be protected from themselves?
    I feel that the FX offers disadvantaged individuals( because of the "Big Dogs") to effectively participate in the FX
    market and to
    profit from it. Like any business there is risk involved - but within reason its the owners (read FX retail client)
    responsibility to manage
    his own risk.
    Hoping for your positive consideration.
    FX Trader
    Cape Town
    South FArica