Comment Text:
i0-001
COMMENT
CL-04813
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Serge Krasnay
Wednesday, February 3, 2010 9:47 AM
secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
Regulation of Retail Forex
RIN 3038-AC61
I'm a writing to voice my opinion about the proposed changes to change leverage to 10:1.
As a responsible retail forex trader, I depend on the current 100:1 to grant me the ability
to risk a healthy 3% of my total $10,000 account and still be able to earn $10 per pip on my trades
because in this case I would be trading about 1 standard lot.
However, the proposed change will force me to trade only 1 mini lot because I don't wanna risk
more than 3% of my 10,000 account. Trading one mini lot, it would take me 5-6 years to grow the
account
to an ammount that will allow me to makea comfortable daily income. Therefore, if the leverage
is dropped,
it will warrant me to move my money to a UK, German, or Swiss broker, where i can still get 100:1
leverage.
This way I will still be able to trade forex as a full time business.
Please keep in mind that I am not the only retail forex trader that will be forced to move my money
to europe.
I am sure you are aware that the average retail forex trader has about $3,700 in their live
accounts.
For them, a 10:1 leverage coupled with their plan to only risk 3% of their accounts will disallow
them to trade
forex completely.
In conclusion, you are not protecting the retail forex trader by lowering the maximum leverage to
10:1.
Thousands of retail traders will close their accounts and simply move it to europe to continue their
trading efforts.
The dollar will drop in value, smaller brokers may go bankrupt, and the big liquidity brokers will
loose clients on the USA front.
I urge you to leave the leverage as it is; to protect the value of the dollar, protect the retail forex
trader in his/her
effort to continue risking 3%, and prevent the transfer of money into europe.
Sincerely,
Serge Krasnay Sr.
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
Sign up now.
