Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Max Graham
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 4380
    Date: 1/28/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-04380
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:15 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN 3038-AC61
    This will only affect small and retail traders who work solely on commission and get no salary whatever.
    Most brokers at present have an automatic closure when the equity in an account falls below a certain
    percentage or indeed zero equity. Thus this protects customer and broker from incurring any debt. This is
    the only regulation that would really be good.
    Leverage does not make a bit of difference as whatever the ratio is, the trade will be 50/50 loosing or
    winning. The big players operate on different rules within their closed system and it would be wonderful if
    we could examine this rather than punishing the normal guy who shares his money with his consumer
    community around him.
    The big players still get enormous salaries on top of commission and bonus; and now want even more by
    corrupting politicians and civil workers alike to make their jobs easier,
    The financial collapse was not caused by leverage but by illiquidity in the specialised [subprime] mortgage
    market they invested, similar in affect but not due to leverage rules. So when the guys at the top came out,
    the rest of the players in the club were left with positions there were no dealers for and could not buy or sell
    unless at ridiculous prices, which only the tax payer could afford after working diligently for years before the
    bust to support the government.
    yo u rs
    Max Graham