Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 76 FR 4752

  • From:
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 42799
    Date: 5/4/2011

    Comment Text:

    Jason Esch
    75 Cedar Street, #9
    Branford, CT 06405-3657


    May 4, 2011

    David Stawick
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581


    Dear Mr. Stawick:

    Excessive speculation hurt the economy in 2008 and, once again, is harming
    the economy in 2011. According to data recently released by the
    Commission, speculators have raised their positions in energy markets by
    64 percent compared to June 2008, bringing speculation to the highest
    level on record.

    We need meaningful, effective speculative position limits to restore
    balance to commodities markets and ensure that they are connected to
    market fundamentals, so that they fulfill their price-discovery function
    properly and without distortions caused by excessive speculation. In
    particular, I:

    • support the Commission's immediate adoption of spot-month speculative
    position limits; • urge the Commission to adopt effective back-month
    levels that will accomplish the legislative purpose of curbing excessive
    speculation; • urge the Commission to adopt single-month limits that are
    no higher than two-thirds of the all-months-combined levels; • urge the
    Commission immediately to adopt a position-accountability regime for the
    nonspot months in place of its proposed position-visibility rule; and •
    urge the Commission to adopt lower speculative position limits for
    passive, long-only traders.

    However, with all due respect, I really don't expect this to happen. This
    goes beyond some corporate profits or "capitalism;" it's going to
    devastate a fragile economy that's been in the progressive stages of
    positive transition. But, I wouldn't expect the people making profits
    hand-over-fist to do anything rational that might actually help the
    country and our economy. Instead, it'd be much easier to continue this
    same nonsensical crap and crush the industry that so utilizes this oil
    that's an essential inelastic good. I'd equate oil speculators to the
    Mafia of the late early-mid 1900's, but then I think I'd be giving the
    Mafia a bad rap. At least their 'tortious deeds' were a little more
    flagrant.

    As I can imagine, there are any number of people who are not very happy
    with the speculators, thus I'm sure your time is limited and likely read
    only a small number of correspondence that you receive. Having said that,
    I wouldn't expect this to be read, so I'll leave you with some few choice
    statements: U.F.O's are real and hiding in Area51, Stonehenge is really a
    portal to another universe, America is a free country, 3-D movies are
    enjoyable to watch, and Wall Street has a conscience. Well, that's enough
    fiction for now.

    Time is of the essence, and I urge you to act quickly. Our pocketbooks and
    the broader economy depend on it.


    P.S. All offers void where valid. No substitutions, extensions or refunds.
    See your local dealer for details. All offers subject to change without
    notice. Pricing and participation may vary. Cheese is tasty.

    Sincerely,


    Jason A Esch
    203-535-9462


Edit
No records to display.