Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: David Conley
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 41
    Date: 1/14/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00041
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    David Conley
    Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:32 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Secretary;
    I am a retail forex trader who resides in USA and currently trade with a registered NFA broker. I want to express
    my complete and total dissagreement with the new proposed changes in forex leverage from 100:1 to 10: 1. I
    trade forex for a living and have done so for over 5 years now. I have never, not once, blown/lost my account
    balance, as a matter of fact I have made money consistently. I've done so mainly because of leverage! Because of
    100:1 leverage I was able to trade enough "lots" to actually make enough money to live on. Anything lower than
    100:1 leverage would not allow me to do this! 10:1 leverage is insane for small time traders like myself.
    I really like my USA NFA broker and desire to stay with them however if leverage is lowered below 100:1 I will be
    forced to move to an unregulated USA broker, either here in USA or overseas. Not only myself but many others too!
    That is not a good thing but again we will be forced to do so.
    Please reconsider the new proposed leverage rule and leave it as it currently is, 100: 1.
    Thank you,
    David Conley
    Lexington, Ky