Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: John Bingaman
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3858
    Date: 1/25/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03858
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    John Bingaman
    Monday, January 25, 2010 5:37 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Secretary, CFTC:
    The reasoning of the Commission's proposed regulation of the retail forex market place appears to be
    that retail forex customers need protection. On the one hand, the rules seem to imply, they need
    protection from dishonest or under-capitalized FCMs and RFEDs. That may be true and several of the
    proposed rules attend to that.
    On the other hand, the proposed 10:1 margin rule seems intended to protect the retail investor from
    himself. Such protection is not possible if the market remains open. Eventually, an investor is going to
    lose more or risk more than the commission believes is prudent and the intent of the 10:1 rule will have
    been violated.
    If a rule mandating 10:1 margin is instituted there will be very few retail forex customers to protect. The
    retail forex "industry" is largely dependent upon high leverage that allows small retail investors to enter
    the market place with their small stakes. (In one sense, then, the high leverage serves the Commission's
    purposes of protecting the consumer.) Eliminate the possibility of entry with a small stake, and retail
    forex will move offshore, where the US investor will have even less protection. The other rules then
    become irrelevant.
    Proper risk management protects the prudent investor in all retail investment markets. Imprudent
    investors will always find ways to lose money. We can protect retail stock investors from stock market
    losses by preventing them from buying stocks. We can protect bond investors by preventing them from
    buying bonds. The same argument can be made for collectibles and real estate.
    Perhaps the Commission has sound reasons for the other proposed regulation of the FCMs and RFEDs.
    These proposals are highly technical -- I leave them to you. However, I strongly object to the idea of
    reducing the leverage of the retail forex market. Please continue to warn investors, cajole them, scare
    them. But don't handcuff them in the name of protection.
    John Bingaman
    1522 Cleveland Avenue
    Wyomissing, PA 19610