Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: David Conley
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 377
    Date: 1/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00377
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    David Conley
    Monday, January 18, 2010 9:09 PM
    secretary
    [] Regulation of Retail Forex []
    Dear Secretary;
    I am a retail forex trader who resides in USA and currently trade with a registered NFA broker. I
    want to express my complete and total dissagreement with the new proposed changes in forex
    leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. Itradeforexfora living and have done so for over5years now. I
    have never, not once, blown/lost my account balance, as a matter of fact I have made money
    consistently. I've done so mainly because of leverage! Because of 100:1 leverage Iwasableto
    trade enough "lots" to actually make enough money to live on. Anything lower than 100:1
    leverage would not allow me to do this! 10:1 leverage is insane for small time traders like myself.
    I really like my USA NFA broker and desire to stay with them however if leverage is lowered below
    100:1 I will be forced to move to an unregulated USA broker, either here in USA or overseas. Not
    only myself but many others too! That is nota good thing but again we will be forced to do so.
    Please reconsider the new proposed leverage rule and leave it as it currently is, 100:1.
    Thank you,
    David Conley
    3304 Hartston Drive
    Lexington, Ky 40515
    contact: corya I pha beta @ya hoo.com