Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Sara L Ames
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3666
    Date: 1/25/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COIMMENT
    CL-03666
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Sara L Ames
    Monday, January 25, 2010 12:35 AM
    secretary < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex -RIN 3038-AC61
    As I read it, the CFTC 1:10 Forex Leverage Proposal in somewhere between
    MISGUIDED and outright LUDICROUS. It appears to me that the CFCT does NOT
    understand Retail Forex market trading and where money management 'Risk' can
    become hazardous to Retail Forex trading. If they DO understand the forex
    market then the proposal is disingenuous at best.
    The stated intent of the CFTC proposal is to protect retail traders from RISK.
    However, what the CFTC is proposing 'INCREASES' the retail traders 'RISK' by a
    factor of '10 TIMES'.
    The math goes this way:
    At the current 1:100 leverage, for each $100.00 of his/her out of pocket Capital
    Investment RISK EXPOSURE the trader is entitled to trade $10,000.00 worth of
    currencies.
    At the proposed 1:10 leverage, the trader is entitled to trade THE SAME
    $10,000.00 worth of currencies but his/her out of pocket Capital Investment RISK
    EXPOSURE is $1,000.00 as opposed to $100.00.
    The CRTC proposal 'INCREASES' out of pocket Capital Investment RISK EXPOSURE
    by '10 TIMES MORE RISK'
    Clearly something is wrong with the proposal; it is either terribly misguided or
    wo rse.
    How would the retail trader's EXPOSURE TO RISK be REDUCED?
    What is the common sense answer that is being overlooked?
    Reducing LEVERAGE from 1:100 to 1:10 is NOT the answer. The proposal as it
    stands as a disaster-in- waiting for retail traders.
    In order to protect the new/naive/self destructive and or otherwise uneducated
    trader from him or herself, ACCOUNT MARGIN LIMITATIONS should be Revised so
    that the trader's out of pocket Capital Investment RISK EXPOSURE is never any
    greater than 5% or 10% or his/her trading account at any time.
    Leave leverage alone. 'LEVERAGE IS NEITHER THE PROBLEM NOR THE SOLUTION.'
    The answer to RISK EXPOSURE is NOT LEVERAGE CONTROL. In fact LEVERAGE
    CONTROL would have the exact OPPOSITE Effect by INCREASING RISK - 'TEN
    FOLD'...
    The answer is 'MARGIN CONTROL'.
    Apart from that, I would call on the CFTC to use whatever pro-active and
    aggressive steps necessary to keep unscrupulous brokers/operators and get-rich-i0-001
    COIMMENT
    CL-03666
    quick-and-easy 'fantasy' educational scams OUT OF BUSINESS.
    You need to police RISK through Margin and Not Through Leverage.
    Please do not pass this rule.
    Sara Ames
    Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
    Get it now.