Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Ted Ciporin
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 356
    Date: 1/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00356
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Ted Ciporin
    Monday, January 18, 2010 4:25 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Hello,
    I had sent in an earlier email but it may not have been in the proper format, so I am sending this in what is
    hopefully the correct way.
    I am a full time forex trader, have had my struggles as anyone would have, but I have been profitable as a
    trader for 2 1/2 years total. The recent regulation that limited forex leverage to 100:1 was not a problem for me.
    However, if that drops to 10:1, it will most likely put me out of business as a full time trader.
    I am not a gambler. I don't need the higher leverage because I like to take huge risks, because don't. But the
    100:1 leverage allows me to trade profitably and responsibly, without requiring an unrealistically high amount of
    cash in my accounts. If leverage drops to 10:1, the only way I could still trade as I do now, would be to get 10
    times the cash I currently have.
    I'm not too sure who this proposed regulation is supposed to help. But it will HURT the following: small traders
    and their families, employees of forex brokers in the US (and their families), any related businesses and their
    employees, the US economy in general, etc. If this 10:1 leverage regulation goes into effect, there will be a
    speedy flight of money out of the US and into accounts of foreign brokers. Although I don't want to do that, have
    been forced to make my own contingency plans along those lines already.
    Thank you for taking my comments into consideration. I would be happy to comment further in the future if
    that may prove helpful...
    Sincerely,
    Ted Ciporin
    PO Box 1466
    Salem, VA 24153
    540-309-4697
    [email protected]