Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 76 FR 4752

  • From: pat dorman
    Organization(s):
    none

    Comment No: 33711
    Date: 3/28/2011

    Comment Text:

    if you must allow any short contracts, the limit should reflect no more than the value of the physical comodity that the contractor holds. COMEX rules should be at least as restrictive as the casinos in Las Vegas. Any person or institution who enters into a short contract, if they donot deliver the comodity, but offers cash or other goods in lieu of the physical comodity should be required to pay a fee to COMEX equal to the premium paid to the purchaser of the contract.

Edit
No records to display.