Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 76 FR 4752

  • From: Sheila Anderson
    Organization(s):
    none

    Comment No: 32090
    Date: 3/22/2011

    Comment Text:

    Dear sirs

    I applaud the Commission’s efforts to implement the Dodd-Frank Act as thoroughly as possible especially reforms aimed at limiting excessive speculation in food and energy commodities.

    While many factors contribute to today’s highly volatile commodity prices, it is clear that excessive speculation is to a great exent responsible, as shown in dozens of studies by members of respected institutions such as Princeton, MIT, Citigroup, Petersen Institute, University of London, Yale, UNCTAD, FAO, and the U.S. Senate. I urge the Commission to implement the proposed rules regarding aggregate speculative position limits to prevent excessive speculation. At this time of fragile economic recovery, we cannot allow speculators to unduly affect our food and energy prices. There is no point in the Act if it remains a paper transaction only.

    Congress called for exemptions from these limits for bona fide hedgers. I ask that the Commission define that term in the strictest sense possible, limiting exemptions to businesses that deal in physical commodities and use markets to hedge commercial risk in those commodities. Banks, hedge funds, private equity and all passive investors in commodities should not be deemed as bona fide hedgers. Institutions hedging price directional bets such as commodity index swaps, Exchange Traded Funds and Exchange Traded Notes also should not be considered as bona fide hedgers.

    a. In order to avoid food and energy price bubbles, the proposed speculation limits must be implemented. (Wall Street is telling the CFTC not to establish these limits.) Please do not give in to lobbying pressures


    Thank you for your consideration.

    Sheila Anderson
    Aberdeen
    Scotland

Edit
No records to display.