Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 76 FR 4752

  • From: Justin Devaney
    Organization(s):
    James Devaney Fuel Co Inc.

    Comment No: 31217
    Date: 3/8/2011

    Comment Text:

    I am writing to voice my support for immediate adoption of the proposed rule on speculative position limits for commodities (RIN 3038–AD15 and 3038–AD16 Position Limits for Derivatives).

    After years of highly volatile commodity markets, the CFTC is finally poised to impose speculative position limits for physical commodities. Dozens of studies by industry experts, economists, academics, and Congressional committees have warned of the harmful affects of excessive speculation and serve only to reinforce the need for meaningful position limits in the commodity markets and therefore adoption of this rule.

    The commodity markets were created to serve bona fide commercial hedgers as a tool for risk mitigation and as a pricing bellwether that is reflective real-world supply and demand fundamentals. But deregulation and massive positions held by speculators have distorted these markets.

    In Title VII of the Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, Congress acknowledged the potential harm of excessive speculation by requiring that the Commission impose speculation limits on currently unregulated markets. I believe the Commission understands its responsibility under existing law to prevent excessive speculation as an undue and unnecessary burden on interstate commerce.

    I urge that the commission strengthen the proposed rule and in light of the growing commodities bubbles that threaten our economic recovery and security, I urge its immediate passage and enforcement.

    Commodities such as energy and food are vital resources to American industries, businesses and consumers first and foremost. Speculators have a role in providing liquidity to the market and helping energy and agriculture companies and consumers manage price risk. But when they dominate these markets (as they do now) they have the opposite effect. They undermine these business’ hedging needs and distort the price discovery functions of the markets.

    My family company has been in business for over 77 years and now becuase of Wall Street greed we stand to face the greatest challenge in the history of our existence. Competition is a great thing, it keeps businesses honest, and allows consumers to have a choice. Natural Gas and Heating Oil have always had fair competition in the market place until now. With the emergence of speculators, hedge funds, investment banks, and money mangers increasing the demand for paper oil the price of oil has skyrocketed to unsustainable levels. Now as the natural gas market remains dead with prices as low as they are the healthy competition is no longer. Add to the fact that these deep pocketed monopolies in the natural gas industry are offering oil heat customers free gas heating systems when they make the switch translates into a lose lose situation for heating oil dealers and the eventual extinction of a great industry, unless action is taken. Obviously there are other factors and important issues that America needs to address in their energy plan, but this is one step to help reduce volatiility and keep prices stables. Get back to the days when the fundamentals of supply and demand drove the market and not speculators looking to extend their profits further and further by driving up the price of crude. We are talking about a zero sum game here where only a few people are winning as compared to the american public who are the biggest losers at the end of the day having to spend their incomes on infalted gasolline and heating oil prices.

    The position limits rule, therefore, will play a crucial role in reestablishing the true purpose of and help return stability and confidence to these markets. Again, I urge adoption of this rule.

    I thank you for your consideration,

    Sincerely,
    Justin Devaney

Edit
No records to display.