Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 76139

  • From: Ex Parte Communication
    Organization(s):
    Kirk W. Freeman (NAREIT)
    Luke Zubrod (Chatham Financial)
    Sam Peterson (Chatham Financial)
    Mark S. Barber (GE Capital)
    Renuka Gupta (GE Capital)
    Bob Shepher (National Association of Manufacturers)
    Matthew Miller (Financial Executives International)
    Vikas Huria (Ford)
    Sally Ingberg (Forest City)
    Stacey Dion (Boeing)
    Aquila Powell (General Motors)
    James Harshaw (General Motors)
    Michael D. Bopp (Gibson Dunn)
    Brian Callanan (Gibson Dunn)

    Comment No: 26736
    Date: 11/23/2010

    Comment Text:

    Coalition for Derivatives End-Users meeting

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010

    Memo from
    Steiner, Jeffrey L.

    CFTC Staff :
    Jeff Steiner
    Julian Hammar
    Thelma Diaz
    John Riley
    Dave Johnson
    George Wilder
    Dan Berkovitz
    Dave Johnson

    External Attendees :
    Kirk W. Freeman (NAREIT)
    Luke Zubrod (Chatham Financial)
    Sam Peterson (Chatham Financial)
    Mark S. Barber (GE Capital)
    Renuka Gupta (GE Capital)
    Bob Shepher (National Association of Manufacturers)
    Matthew Miller (Financial Executives International)
    Vikas Huria (Ford)
    Sally Ingberg (Forest City)
    Stacey Dion (Boeing)
    Aquila Powell (General Motors)
    James Harshaw (General Motors)
    Michael D. Bopp (Gibson Dunn)
    Brian Callanan (Gibson Dunn)

    Additional Information :
    Real-time Reporting
    General
    Expressed concern about the relationship of block trade delays with getting good pricing.  Any reporting requirements would affect their price.  A dealer would need to off-set the risk of the transaction and they would do so as quickly as they can, therefore large or illiquid trades would cause the most concern since they may not be able to off-set the risk.  Front-running is a concern since it would lead to increased up-front costs to the end-user.  The prices provided to end-users would be greater since the dealers would factor the risk of not being able to off-set the transaction into the price.
     
    Time Delay
    For standardized trades that are not too large, 15 minutes may be ample time.  For sufficiently large or illiquid trades, 15 minutes may not be enough.  It could take a day or more for illiquid transactions to be off-set.  Illiquid transactions may occur in all asset classes, including interest rates and currency.  Whether a swap is illiquid may depend on the time of day and the term.
     
    "As soon as technologically practicable"
    Expressed concern of whether “as soon as technologically practicable” would mean the same for swaps under the 2(h)(7) exception as swaps that are executed on SEFs or DCMs.
     
    Data fields
    Expressed interest on how data fields should be properly defined.  Mentioned that requiring the reporting of credit terms could cause confusion.
     
    Reporting of transactions if no SDR or third-party service provider
    Asked question of how reporting will occur if there is no SDR or third-party service provider.  Staff responded that the issue is open for public comment.

Edit
No records to display.