Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 63732

  • From: Bruce Deitch
    Organization(s):
    Kasden Fuel, Inc.

    Comment No: 26408
    Date: 11/16/2010

    Comment Text:

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Attn: David Stawick , Secretary
    Three Lafayette Center
    1155 21"Street, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20581

    Dear Chairman Gensler:

    I write to express my concern about the proposed Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
    As a Connecticut energy supply company, I write to ask for you to adopt a rule that will accurately reflect the intent of Sections 726 and 765 of the Dodd-Frank Financial Services Reform Act and the Lynch Amendment that originally passed in the House of Representatives.

    In the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) proposed rulemaking on this topic, your agency has correctly identified many of the conflicts of interest that will arise if swap dealers control market infrastructure. If these dealers are allowed to continue to control the clearing function, now only five large dealers control over 97% of this market, they will restrict access to clearing prices, limit the number of products that are cleared, and skew the clearinghouse's risk management decisions.

    The current CFTC proposed regulation fails to address the conflicts identified by the agency and would completely miss Congress' goal of adopting rules that promote open, true and fair competition. If these regulations are adopted as proposed, clearing and trading will be monopolized until the agencies put stronger collective ownership limits in place.

    One of the key goals of the legislation was to have the CFTC adopt clear and tough rules that would help to promote fair and open competition in the trading marketplace. It also sought to have the CFTC, through these regulations, mitigate systemic risk and conflicts of interest to ensure that competition remained open and fair.

    It is absolutely essential that the CFTC strongly oppose allowing dealers to band together under the guise of a 5% cap on ownership by any one entity to avoid a broader class-of-ownership cap. We need to do this so we can prevent the domination of a clearinghouse, swap execution facility or exchange by a small number of dealers.

    Very truly yours,

    Bruce Deitch
    President
    Kasden Fuel

Edit
No records to display.