Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Rolando P Valdivia
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 227
    Date: 1/17/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00227
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Rolando Pimentel_Valdivia
    Sunday, January 17, 2010 4:13 AM
    secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
    Public Comment on Proposed Regulations Regarding Retail
    FOREX Transactions
    David Stawick, Secretary
    1155 21st Street N.W.
    Washington, DC 20581
    Public Comment on Proposed Regulations Regarding Retail FOREX Transactions
    To Whom It May Concern: I think lowering the leverage requirement for retail FOREXtransactions
    will do the exact opposite in regards to customer protection.
    It wouldn't matter if you lowered or raised the leverage amount in terms of customer protection.
    The fact of the matter is many uneducated people try their hand at FOREX and lose. Reducing
    leverage will not change this outcome when FOREX brokers blanket the internet with advertising
    promising fast and easy money with a little disclaimer at the bottom of heavy risks of loss.
    The fact is the FOREX is a zero sum market. Lowering the leverage of retail FOREX in the U.S.
    would do nothing but kill a legitimate business. Why would Americans keep trading in a climate
    that is laden with laws against them? Why would foreigners open a FOREXtrading account in the
    U.S. when the rules are prohibitively against them compared to other jurisdictions around the
    globe? [Leverage works for you as much as against you.]
    We have already suffered massive restrictions in the U.S. already from the NFA with imposing No
    hedge rules and FIFO. Most U.S. brokers have already opened brokerages outside the U.S. already
    due to the enactment of these rules and to my knowledge all have plans to do so.
    By enacting this legislation to restrict and limit traders further will only cause a mass exodus of
    FOREX trading in the retail U.S. markets.
    This will cause American traders to put their money in less than scrupulous brokers with less ethics
    than what the U.S. permits via the NFA oversight. So if American traders put their money in a
    foreign FOREX broker how can you say this will benefit the trader? How will this protect the
    American trader? How will this benefit the U.S. based broker? How will this encourage investment
    from foreign means in the retail U.S. FOREX market when rules around the globe are more
    favorable to the trader?
    Are we not satisfied until we move all high paying jobs overseas?
    Before we were hit with all the erroneous NFA rules and regulations we were afforded up to 400:1
    leverage. Guess what? people were blowing accounts even at that level. Changing the level of
    leverage will do nothing to prevent someone from blowing an account or losing in FOREX.
    The U.S. retail FOREX market is an infant when comparing it to the U.K. and various other places.
    Yet they don't see the need for these kinds of rules and restrictions. If you are so worried about
    the consumer you should educate them and not restrict them.i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00227
    Because an educated trader will know better when the time comes. Limiting leverage or some of
    these other ridiculous things the lawmakers that be come up with all in the name to protect us
    from OURSELVES? Whata pathetic joke. If it's not obvious already I would hope that you elect to
    leave leverage rates the way they currently are at the minimum of 100:1. Otherwise the blood of
    the retail U.S. FOREX markets are on your hands and the people you are trying to protect will be
    leaving your jurisdiction in droves.
    Sincerely,
    Rolando Pimentel Valdivia
    Recibe gratis un resumen diario de tu Hotmail en tu m6vil, iRecibelo ya!