Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Michael Guilford
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1899
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01899
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    James Guilford
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:45 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Secretary Stawick,
    I agree with most of the changes the CFTC is proposing -- with one exception; the proposed reduction in
    allowable leverage from 100 to 1 down to 10 to 1. I understand this is being offered as a means to
    protect retail traders and keep smaller traders from participating in this market. However, the main effect
    will be to drive smaller traders to open accounts abroad, where there is much more lax regulation, and to
    risk a higher percentage of their portfolio, thereby endangering them much more than the 100 to 1
    leverage. Personally, I use stops and only risk 1% of my available cash on any one trade. If the leverage
    ratio is lowered to 10:1, I would have to risk more of my funds in order to trade, and that makes no
    sense to me.
    The risks of high leverage is well understood by 99.999 percent of retail traders, and is one of the main
    reasons they participate in the FOREX market. Several friends of mine were able to start with small
    stakes and build a substantial nest egg with this leverage. Now, you propose to take that opportunity
    away from me. Perhaps a special waiver could be signed stating that the participant is fully aware of the
    risks of such a high leverage ratio. I have to tell you I don't like that very much. Please leave the
    allowable leverage at 100 to 1.
    Thank you,
    Michael Guilford
    2403 Pima Lane
    Ventura, CA 93001