Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Burke Henehan
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 17379
    Date: 4/26/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-08379
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Burke Henehan
    Monday, April 26, 2010 12:22 PM
    secretary
    Proposed Federal Speculative Position Limits for Referenced Energy Contracts
    and Associated Regulations
    Mr. Secretary,
    I would like to add my voice in support of position limits on energy products.
    I think this must be done through the regulatory process and not left simply to Congressional approval. I
    believe that will take too long and is very heavily influenced by wall street and energy industry money.
    Speculation needs to be limited to hedging and be a small portion of the total energy market. Prices
    should be driven by the balance between Production and Consumption, not by how much energy is
    controlled by financiers on Wall Street or London.
    When wall street speculators go with their Federal Reserve window Billions into the oil markets they are
    creating demand. When they consummate the purchase they have just reduced supply. All of these are
    financial transactions that result in no jobs and no products being produced in the USA. An extremely
    poor use of Government resources.
    So when wall street says the cost of oil is the result of "supply and demand" the proper response is
    "DUH!" Speculators create demand and reduce supply. The more appropriate question is are
    Production and Consumption in balance or have they been corrupted by too much speculation? I believe
    they have been corrupted by speculation.
    Crude oil prices are climbing towards $100 a barrel in spite of lower worldwide consumption. It is clear
    that excessive speculation, not higher consumption or lower supply is responsible for current oil prices
    being 145 percent greater than 2009 [] s lows.
    B. Henehan