Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Michael Stein
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 13787
    Date: 4/13/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-04787
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:39 AM
    secretary
    Proposed Speculative Position Limits on Energy
    Michael Stein
    263 Parker Rd
    Chapel Hill, NC 27517-9142
    April 13, 2010
    David Stawick
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I support the CFTC's Proposed Federal Speculative Position Limits to
    establish speculative position limits on major energy commodities. This
    rule will improve stability to the energy marketplace and help prevent
    future price bubbles. The CFTC must quickly approve a strong rule to
    protect America's struggling economy.
    Wall Street's speculative trading in oil hurt the economy. It will
    continue to hurt every American who pays excessive prices at the pump, for
    groceries, home heating oil and everything related to transportation.
    I am usually in support of market trading; i.e. allowing the marketplace
    itself set the price via supply and demand. HOWEVER, speculative trading
    is NOT market trading! It creates the illusion of lack of supply or
    excessive demand, thus preventing the market from responding to the actual
    forces in play. In this particular market, establishing position limits
    will support actual conditions influencing the market.
    Our tax dollars bailed out large Wall Street firms when they were on the
    brink of bankruptcy. Through excessive speculation, these same
    institutions pushed the price of gasoline well past $4 per gallon in 2008
    by gambling on oil. and continue to profit at every American's expense.
    Rampant oil speculation by large Wall Street trading firms created extreme
    volatility in energy markets and unwarranted price spikes in recent years.
    Given that supplies are at record highs and U.S. demand remains weak,
    these fundamentals do not explain the recent price hikes and price swings.
    Unless the CFTC adopts the proposed rule, markets will continue to
    fluctuate wildly, at the expense of the American consumer.
    Position limits existed in energy markets until 2001 and currently apply
    to agricultural commodities. CFTC should use its existing experience &
    regulate position limits of speculators to prevent excessive concentration10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-04787
    in the energy markets, ~vhile ensuring that exemptions to these limits are
    afforded to real physical players such as fuel cooperatives, public
    utilities, truckers and airlines.
    I need energy stability. As I, and other Americans, seek to find our ~vay
    out of the recession, consistent, reliable, & some~vhat predictable energy
    prices allo~v us to effectively budget still limited resources so that they
    can be channeled into many areas of the economy, and not just energy. I
    encourage the CFTC to adopt the Proposed Federal Speculative Position
    Limits before volatile fuel prices further harm the country's already
    ~veakened economy.
    Sincerely,
    Michael Stein
    9199323632