Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Terry Moran
    Organization(s):
    Keyser Energy Hugh Duffy Coal & Oil Co Inc

    Comment No: 13020
    Date: 4/13/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-04020
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:59 AM
    secretary
    Comments on Proposed Speculative Position Limits for Energy (File # 10-002)
    Terry Moran
    Keyser Energy - Hugh Duffy Coal & Oil Co. Inc.
    190 West St.
    Rutland, VT 05701-2849
    April 13, 2010
    David Stawick
    Secretary, U.S. CFTC
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I am writing today to endorse comments submitted by the Petroleum
    Marketers Association of America and the New England Fuel Institute
    submitted on April 9, 2010 on the proposed rule to implement speculative
    position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude
    oil, heating oil and gasoline. I am also writing to add my own thoughts
    on this matter to the public record.
    Up until August of 2009 1 owned and operated a 117 year old, fourth
    generation fuel supply business. The speculation that has driven prices up
    and down, in essence, manipulation of the market, has in effect allowed
    individuals and their companies to reap large profits by controlling which
    direction the market is going to go and operating with that inside
    information. I found that it was no longer worth it to continue to operate
    when the predictability of the market was no longer dependent on true
    market forces but left to the whimsical desires of a few very greedy and
    unscrupulous parties operating outside the rules without oversight or
    concern for those of us operating honestly. I have sold my business,
    suffered a stoke, lost a good deal of money and equity in my company and
    watched many of my customers suffer large losses and remain incapable of
    paying their heating bills from the last two years. Washington (House and
    Senate, as well as regulators) in my eyes are out of touch with how the
    rest of us have to live in these times and don't appear to care. It's
    taken far too long for any action to take place and most of us at the Main
    Street level have lost faith in our "leadership". If you're really
    interested in fixing the problem it's time for action.
    Futures markets were designed as a tool for bona fide commercial
    businesses and end-users to manage risk and "discover" prices for energy
    based on supply and demand economics. Businesses and consumers rely on
    these markets and are harmed when they become excessively volatile or
    subject to extreme price shocks, as we saw with the 2007-2008 energy10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-04020
    bubble. In the past ten years, such events have become common and federal
    regulators failed to take assertive action to address the causes and to
    restore confidence in the energy futures markets.
    By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemaking, the Commission has
    an opportunity to take an important step in this regard. It ~vill begin
    addressing the main cause of recent market instability - excessive
    speculation. Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index
    funds, speculate in the energy commodities markets for profit, rather than
    commodity-related businesses and users, ~vho do so to protect themselves
    from volatility and risk. Speculators take on the risk that hedgers seek
    to shed, ho~vever speculation should not dominate the markets. Moreover,
    one speculator or class of speculator should not be allo~ved to take a
    large, controlling position in any a single commodity.
    The Commission has a statutory obligation, if not a compelling moral
    obligation, to establish hard limits on the size of positions that
    speculators can take in these markets, and to bar them from any
    exemptions. The rule that has been proposed is not perfect, and again, I
    strongly urge the technical improvements suggested by the comments I have
    ~vritten to endorse.
    In considering the rule, Commissioners must look past opposition by the
    financial community and remember the affect that excessive speculation has
    on businesses like mine, my consumers and the broader economy. It should
    establish restrictive speculative position limits, and implement them
    expeditiously, before ~ve see a repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and
    another major shock to a country still recovering from recession.
    Thank you for your consideration.
    Sincerely,
    Terry Moran
    (802)773 -2567