Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Lance Stranahan
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1295
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01295
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:20 PM
    secretary
    STRONGLY OBJECT TO 10-1 LEVERAGE LIMIT IN REGULATION OF
    RETAIL FOREX PROPOSAL RI
    Attn : David Stawick, Secretary, CFTC
    and ALL CFTC policymakers:
    As a non-affiliated US-based Retail FX trader, please note for the record that I am STRONGLY OPPOSED to
    the 10-1 leverage limit as proposed in RIN 3038-AC61 relating to the Regulation of Retail Forex.
    Counter-productive effects
    This senseless limit would in NO way protect, aid or benefit me but rather would greatly harm me since this
    restriction, if passed,
    [] would require that l submit substantially more margin-funds into non-protected, non-FDIC insured, non-SlPC
    eligible accounts, actually exposing me to increased risk in the event of bankruptcy of my Forex Broker.
    [] would NOT divert my business into regulated-Futures trading (as the CFTC is probably hoping), but rather
    would cause me to seek an unreliable, higher-risk offshore FX broker to trade through, whose practices might
    be questionable.
    [] would eliminate one of the greatest benefits of trading Forex : My ability to efficiently deploy my own trading
    capital in the way that I choose.
    Lower FX vols require far greater leverage
    FX volatilities are generally substantially lower than in the Equities or Futures market. Therefore, significantly
    more leverage is required simply to capture equivalent trading opportunities.
    Nanny not needed
    I do not want the CFTC to treat me like a child and dictate how I should trade. While 100-1 leverage is available
    to me - should I choose it - I am never forced to use it.
    The bottom line is that OTC Retail Forex trading is NOT Futures trading. Please do not try to treat it as such!
    PLEASE IMMEDIATELY STRIKE YOUR PROPOSED 10-1 LEVERAGE LIMITATIONS.
    Don[]t let proposal RIN 3038-AC61 become an expensive lesson in unintended consequences[].
    Thank you.
    Lance Stranahan