Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Roberto Azank
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 121
    Date: 1/15/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00121
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Roberto Azank
    Friday, January 15, 2010 8:02 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Sirs:
    I am writing in regards to the changes proposed in RIN 3038-AC61.
    Although I favor much of the changes proposed to insure the public
    safety when dealing with all peoples involved in handling other
    peoples investment (even though it means I'll have to take the exam
    and register and pay the yearly dues), I do have serious objections
    to the motion to limit leverage to 10:1.
    Clearly it will benefit new traders, but it will devastate trading
    techniques that we have developed over years. These techniques are
    meant to distribute risk over many different forex pairs, trading
    small lots, and expecting average small gains based on usual market
    movement. This cannot be implemented with the proposed small
    leverage. It will simply cease to be a way of trading, which will
    force me to look into moving my account and those of my clients to a
    broker outside the US. There is really no choice since the trading
    program will be dead the moment this regulation goes into effect.
    My clients have relatively small accounts, about $5000, and without
    leverage of 100:1 there would not be enough buying power that would
    allow diversifying the risk and going for small gains.
    Please reconsider the issue. Having to move the accounts overseas
    makes trading far less secure for the public, drains capital from the
    US and certainly kills some industry jobs.
    Perhaps you can find a way to regulate in favor of safety, without
    forcing us to leave our US brokers, the US legal system safety that
    would not be available with an overseas broker, and the safety of
    having all industry members register with the NFA. Obviously if we do
    business overseas your motion of having us register with the NFA
    loses ground, since those brokers will not demand registration to
    allow us to trade clients accounts. All in all it sounds that it
    would be doing much more harm than good.
    Perhaps a stringent wording warning new traders might educate them so
    they can use the tools of the trade safely.
    Thanks for your attention to this matter.
    Sincerely
    Roberto Azank

    From uploaded file 121_BPACConsole.txt:

    1/4/2010 3:55:29 PM... 23 change(s) to BPAC list.
    1/4/2010 4:02:59 PM, True... 23 change(s) to BPAC list.