Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Dennis Demeglio
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1191
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01191
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    dzintruder@aol, com
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:34 PM
    secretary
    leverage changes
    As an educated investor, I am strongly oppossed to the proposed leverage changes for the retail Forex
    investor. This change would amount to an expected return on margin of .1% per pip. The reward is certainly not
    worth the time and effort. It is a shame that you feel my hand, as well as the countless others, must still be held
    to cross a street. We are well aware of the risks associated with Forex and that has been fully brought to our
    attention when seeking this type of investment.
    Perhaps you should consider similar warnings as that is required for options trading and that these signed risks
    disclosures are kept on record with account applications.
    Your efforts and regulations shpuld be directed to those that partake in fraud and fraudelant practices. Maybe
    properly licensing and bonding of the brokers is where you should be directing your efforts. You are just forcing
    traders to seek investment and FX brokers outside the US. That is not in our best interests.
    Please reconsider this unnecesary regulation change.
    The loss of business will force firms to either close operations or relocate outside the U.S. adding to the
    unemploment rools those forced to quit or be fired. This, plus all the industries that are based on retail Forex
    such as Software applications, newsletters and educational programs.
    Thank you,
    dennis demeglio